![]() ![]() At the fastest rate, not every camera gives you live view in the EVF, which means there is a lag to consider and that can throw you off guard (resulting in a poorer score until you get used to it).The continuous shooting speed you select in the menu and the actual speed the camera uses are not always exactly the same, and some settings can slow it down too (for example the X-T3 speed decreases when using Focus Priority, but the latter is an important setting to improve the AF rate).For example, the X-T3 won’t manage 2 seconds at 20fps (with RAW), so if the action lasts 4 seconds, the A7 IV will give you more images in focus. Some cameras may have more fps but the buffer might be limited.The camera with the better AF has a higher chance of giving you good images where the action is at its most crucial (for example when a bird is grabbing a fish in the water). There are no settings that let you control where the out of focus images will end up in a sequence.The A7 IV may have a slower drive speed, but its autofocus is more realiable in every situation, whereas the X-T3 will struggle at times. Personally, I think the AF score gives you a more realistic representation of how much the camera can be trusted. ![]() Considering that wildlife is often about capturing difficult moments that may not happen again, many photographers will prefer to have more images on the SD card and that is a fair assessment.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |